9 Comments
User's avatar
Michael John Dennis's avatar

President Trump is going to have to take direct US Military action to protect and defend British Military veterans against the rogue U.K. establishment and U.K. state - US Military Intervention and assistance to put a U.K. military government into power seems the only real solution

Dick Hallam's avatar

A great article in The Spectator exposing the risk to UK USA SF and diplomatic relations. Now there is a focus on the impact on UK relationship with USA we must discern which (country or countries) globally benefit from this rift? There is a saying that 'one stick is easy to break - but a bunch of sticks is impossible'. As a small island we need big friends that speak our language. Who is it that is determined to split the UK and USA? Starmer is not clever enough to tie his shoe laces - he is just someone's useful idiot.

Smudga smorch's avatar

Cannot believe this god forsaken government 🤬

Layla Mcfadyen's avatar

The whole thing is getting worse each day

BenN's avatar

Well veteran brothers and sisters yet another day of; "Blimey O'Reilly!" Again, a great big Bravo to our representatives on briefing our American cousins on the dire situation that we face. Without American support we would be totally "Fucked! There, we have it in a nutshell! And now, I call on "The Jackals" to put things right, as only they know how,!!! 🙏💪💪

colin ferguson's avatar

This is too serious to ignore

Gandolf Guerilla's avatar

There is no doubt. As a world player, Britain is impotent. Another organ of the WEF, which is impotent outside of Europe

I hope we leave NATO. Have fun with ww3, which Europe would definitely lose

Robert Davies's avatar

Senitor Rep Pat Harrigan. Is speaking to president Trumps administration and others. As he is speaking to contacts in the UK and Australia. Senitor Harrigan has talked about the UK Attorney General Hermer. Questioning his abilities.

Suman Suhag's avatar

Upgrading security is necessary. but not sufficient. Moving from static defense to AI-driven, adaptive protection systems may reduce immediate risk, but it does not address the source.

Because this is not just a security failure. It is a signal of rising societal pressure reaching the highest levels of power.

Political polarization, misinformation, and social fragmentation are no longer background issues. they are active destabilizers of governance itself.

When leadership becomes a target, the system is no longer containing stress. It is beginning to mirror it.

The goal is not only to protect leaders. It is to reduce the conditions that make leadership a target.

Rebuild trust in institutions

Reduce information disorder

Strengthen social cohesion under pressure

A system that relies only on stronger protection will eventually fail. A system that reduces internal pressure becomes naturally more stable.

The future of security is not just defense. It is societal stability by design.