Ukraine: Will Our Troops Become Pawns in Starmer's and Hermer's Legal Games?

Is Starmer prioritising political optics over protecting our troops? Concerns mount that deploying soldiers to Ukraine could leave them vulnerable to legal battles years down the line.

As Sir Keir Starmer talks about deploying British troops we need to ask what safeguards will be in place to protect them from legal persecution years after they have put their lives at risk at the behest of the government?

We've already seen veterans are chased, hounded, and vilified for decades in endless investigations and legal proceedings, with elderly servicemen dragged through the courts over actions taken in the heat of conflict.

And the cause of this pernicious behaviour? As in the case of every aspect of our government’s business, the lawyers are in control, led by the high priest of human rights, Keir Starmer, and his alter boy, Hermer, ‘elected’ into government by literally no one, yet wielding enormous power over our lives, wholly accountable to no-one, and hidden from sight (of the elected parliament).

For those not keeping up at the back this is not how it should be done. Our socialist government has adopted the European model of inherently disimissing voters. The trick to getting everything they want — including making radical changes to how the country is run —is to make up stories (they call it narratives), while avoiding people as much as possible.

Whenever you hear any politician claim in the media that they are doing what they do ‘for the majority of people in this country’, you know they are lying. Forget anything you might understand about what we call democracy in the UK, it is a sham — a con. The lawyers are in control and they just don’t care. They have the deck stacked in their favour. And the Supreme Court in their pocket for when it gets really tricky.

Governments now employ the law to control the morality of our country. We are controlled by legal jihadis, who make Cromwell look like a proper liberal.

Apparently our Prime Minister ‘cannot’ interfere in the legal process when it suits him, thus avoiding answering valid questions about the murderous cretin who slaughtered those children in Southport. But he can interfere in the legal process when he was effectively sentencing protestors from the Dispatch Box before some had even been arraigned. In any other case that is prejudicing the rights of the accused. But no, the legal system is solely for the use of those in control and no-one else.